The indigenous oil firm, Seplat Energy Plc has petitioned the National Judicial Council (NJC) to sanction I.E. Ekwo, a justice of the Federal High Court Abuja for ‘unethical, gross misconduct, and abuse of judicial power” in granting ex-parte orders in several cases involving Seplat and some of its shareholders.
In a 6-page petition dated May 15, 2023, signed by Seplat’s Acting CEO/Chief Operating Officer, Samson Ezugworie, and addressed to the Chief Justice of the Federation and Chairman, National Judicial Council, Abuja, the oil firm asked the NJC to dispassionately investigate its
complaint and ensure appropriate disciplinary action against the Hon. Justice Ekwo.
The petitioner stated that the orders granted in SUIT NO. FHC/ABJ/CS/626/2023 between Juliet Ebere Nwadi Gbaka and 2 Ors. v. Seplat Energy Plc and 13 Ors. are designed to cripple Seplat operations.
It explained further that the orders granted by His Lordship in the above suit on May 11, 2023, in ‘very questionable circumstances are designed to hinder the affected directors and secretary of Seplat in the performance of their contractual and statutory duties to Seplat.”
Seplat stated that the SUIT NO. FHCIABJ/PET/8/2023 BETWEEN BONIFACE OKIEZIE & 3 ORS V. SEPLAT ENERGY PLC & 9 ORS filed on April 13, 2023, by some shareholders of Seplat whose shareholding is less than 0.0005% of Seplat’s entire share capital had cited alleged unfairly prejudicial conduct in the management of the affairs of Seplat.
Ekwo was accused of making far-reaching orders and sidelining all these processes and ordered that directors of Seplat and its secretary should desist from further acting in their official capacities, and also ordered SEC to appoint some other persons to replace them on the 11th of May, even though similar orders sought in the April petition have not been granted by His Lordship and the various applications in SUIT NO. FHCIABJ/PET/8/2023 BETWEEN BONIFACE OKIEZIE & 3 ORS V. SEPLAT ENERGY PLC & 9 ORS have been adjourned to the 31st May 2023.
“It is evident that the approach of His Lordship will compromise the fair hearing of the applications in the April Petition. It is also amazing that the above suit, which was filed on the 8th of May 2023, which was not listed on the cause list on the 9th and 11th of May 2023, respectively, was heard by His Lordship”, the petition added.
“We believe that this can only be possible because of prior direct communication between His Lordship and Counsel to the Plaintiffs in the above suit.” This, we believe, is highly unethical’ , it stated.
Seplat also believes that it is an act of gross misconduct on the part of His Lordship.
to gloss over various applications filed by Seplat and some of its directors and
Secretary, on May 10, 2023, challenged the competence of the suit and the
jurisdiction of the court to entertain the suit.
“As it were, the orders made by His Lordship on May 11, 2023, will compromise the fair hearing of these pending applications filed by Seplat and other respondents.”
READ ALSO: APC pulls out of petition against election of PDP governorship candidate in Rivers
Seplat said it “has every reason to believe that all the steps taken by His Lordship in the
The above suits are designed to favor the plaintiffs and disfavor Seplat and its directors.
and secretary. Seplat, its directors, and the Secretary’s position are corroborated by
other cases and events.”
Seplat also disclosed that the Final Judgment in Suit No. FHCIABJ/PETI7/2023 BETWEEN AKINDURO ERIC AKINNIFESI & ANOR V. SEPLAT ENERGY PLC was wrongly ignored by Hon. Justice I.E. Ekwo.
Some shareholders of Seplat were genuinely worried about the likely stalling of the company’s 2023 AGM scheduled for May 10, 2023, and instituted the above suit, praying for mandatory orders for the meeting to be held.
They also sought an order that the directors and company secretary should not be removed from office or hindered in the performance of their duties by any person or authority. Final
The judgment was delivered by Hon. Justice A. R. Mohammed of the same Abuja
Judicial Division of the Federal High Court
The petitioners succeeded in the suit, and the court ordered that Seplat’s AGM be held as scheduled and that the directors and company secretary should neither be removed from office nor hindered in the performance of their duties. A copy of the judgment is attached.
SEPLAT 11.
It is noteworthy that the above judgment was brought to the attention of His Lordship, Hon. Justice I. E. Ekwo, by some of the counsel representing the respondents in suit no. FHCIABJ/CS/626/2023 between Juliet Ebere Nwadi Gbaka and 2 ors. v. Seplat Energy Plc and 13 ors. via various processes filed by them on May 10, 2023.
The exhibited judgment of Hon. Justice A. R. Mohammed, along with letters and processes notifying His Lordship of the subsisting judgment, are attached as SEPLAT 12.
Notwithstanding his Lordship’s attention being directed to the subsisting judgment
of a more senior judge (Hon. Justice A. R. Mohammed) of the same Federal High
Court, His Lordship made orders on May 11, 2023, which contradict and indeed
have the capacity to overrule the judgment of Hon. Justice A. R. Mohammed.
Seplat believes that it is improper for His Lordship, whose attention had been drawn
to the existing final judgment of a brother judge, to sit as an appellate court over such
judgment through the rendition of an interlocutory ruling that conflicts with the
said final judgment.
On the strength of the above, Seplat invites the NJC to dispassionately investigate its
complaint and ensure appropriate disciplinary action against Hon. Justice Ekwo.
(omayowa@globalfinancialdigest.com; Newsroom: +234 8033 964 138)
